Partner programme ownershipWork experience · NorthstarStrong
CV: owned partner onboarding and launch plans for regulated European markets.
AI candidate analysis
Making things easier for human review.
Once the vacancy requirements, CV, and application answers are in Hire, candidate analysis explains the score requirement by requirement and prepares strengths, remarks, and interview questions for recruiter review. It does not decide who advances.
Kiran MehtaImplementation manager · Application review82vacancy fit
Two requirements are supported. Negotiation authority needs clarification.
Led multi-market launches
Owned delivery relationships
Relevant implementation scope
Notice period not stated
Decision belongs to the hiring team
Requirement-level evidence
A score you can inspect, not a verdict you have to trust.
Every requirement shows the candidate evidence behind its result. Confidence describes how completely the available sources support that result, not the candidate's likelihood of success. Missing or unclear evidence stays visible as uncertainty and cannot become an automatic hiring decision.
Requirement-level evidenceWhy the score looks like this
Application analysis · Version 4Cross-functional deliveryWork experience · NorthstarStrong
CV: coordinated Product, Legal, Operations, and Commercial stakeholders.
Enterprise negotiationEvidence missingUncertain
The CV names commercial ownership but does not describe contract size or negotiation authority.
Missing evidence stays visible and cannot trigger an automatic decision.
Strengths, remarks, and questions
Start the interview where the CV stops.
Hire generates vacancy-specific strengths and remarks when a candidate applies with a CV. Concerns become suggested interview questions, giving the hiring team a practical way to clarify what the application cannot prove.
Relevant market ownership
Clear cross-functional scope
Contract negotiation depth needs clarification.
Tell us about a partner agreement you personally negotiated. Which terms did you own?
How many partner launches did you manage at the same time, and what changed as the portfolio grew?
Corrections and analysis history
Keep the original analysis and every reasoned correction.
Each analysis run is stored as its own version with the model and prompt schema used. Recruiters can correct a criterion with supporting evidence and a written reason without rewriting the original record.
Enterprise negotiation
UncertainEvidence confirmed
Recruiter reviewed the candidate's application answer and added the cited evidence.
Correction saved with reason
Prompt-injection detection
They might be smart, but we're smarter.
Hire warns reviewers when CV or application text attempts to influence the analysis. The attempted instruction is ignored, remains available for review, and cannot reject or downrank the candidate.
Reviewer warningAttempted prompt injection detected
Candidate-provided text included instructions aimed at changing the analysis. Hire ignored the instructions and kept the content available for human review.
The warning does not reject or downrank the candidate
Uncertain evidence remains neutral
A recruiter decides whether to continue, correct, or rerun the analysis
AI candidate analysis questions
Explainable recruiter assistance, answered.
Clear answers about evidence, uncertainty, interview questions, corrections, versions, and human decisions.
Does Hire decide who advances?
No. Hire prepares evidence, a vacancy-fit score, strengths, remarks, and suggested questions for recruiter review. A person decides whether to continue, correct the record, request more evidence, or take another hiring action.
What happens when evidence is missing or uncertain?
Hire shows what is missing or unclear and keeps that requirement neutral. Confidence describes the available evidence, not the candidate's likelihood of success. The recruiter can review the source, ask a follow-up question, or correct the criterion when better evidence is available.
Where do the suggested interview questions come from?
Hire turns vacancy-relevant concerns and gaps in the application evidence into candidate-specific questions. Recruiters review the suggestions before adding them to the interview plan.
Can a recruiter correct the analysis?
Yes. A recruiter can correct a criterion with supporting evidence and a written reason. Hire keeps the original analysis, the correction, and its effect on the visible result.
What is stored with each analysis version?
Each immutable analysis version keeps its structured result and provenance, including the exact model and prompt schema used. A new run creates a separate record rather than silently changing the previous analysis.
Review one application
Give recruiters a useful starting point without giving AI the decision.
See how Hire turns vacancy and application evidence into an explainable starting point for recruiter review.
- Requirement-level evidence
- Explainable scoring
- Suggested questions
- Versioned analysis
- Prompt-injection warnings
- Human decisions